A Framework for Efficiency Analysis and Resource Allocation Using Inverse DEA under Uncertainty

Authors

https://doi.org/10.48314/anowa.v1i4.63

Abstract

Inverse Data Envelopment Analysis (Inv-DEA) determines the input increase required for a Decision-Making Unit (DMU) to increase its outputs, or the additional outputs attainable when inputs rise to a predetermined level, all while maintaining current efficiency. Traditional Inv-DEA models assume precise (crisp) data. However, real-world applications often involve imprecise inputs and outputs due to inherent complexity and uncertainty. This study introduces a methodological framework that integrates uncertainty theory based on belief degrees into both input-oriented and output-oriented Inv-DEA models. The proposed models are applied to resource allocation problems. We employ uncertain programming techniques to convert the resulting nonlinear uncertain Inv-DEA models into solvable deterministic linear programs. This transformation is achieved through two key approaches: For models with uncertain variables in the objective function, we use the expected value criterion to optimize average performance. For models with uncertain constraints, we apply chance-constrained programming. This framework effectively addresses essential uncertainty, enabling computational solution via standard linear programming techniques. To validate the practical applicability and effectiveness of the proposed inverse DEA methodology for resource allocation, we conduct an efficiency evaluation using a numerical example.     

Keywords:

Data envelopment analysis, Inverse data envelopment analysis , Efficiency, Uncertainty, Resource allocation

References

  1. [1] Wei, Q., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2000). An inverse DEA model for inputs/outputs estimate. European journal of operational research, 121(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00007-7

  2. [2] Emrouznejad, A., Yang, G., & Amin, G. R. (2019). A novel inverse DEA model with application to allocate the CO2 emissions quota to different regions in Chinese manufacturing industries. Journal of the operational research society, 70(7), 1079–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1489344

  3. [3] Liu, M., & CHAN, S. H. (2024). Optimizing supply chain efficiency using cross-efficiency analysis and inverse dea models. WORLD, 7(5), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.53469/wjimt.2024.07(05).20

  4. [4] Shiri Daryani, Z., Tohidi, G., Daneshian, B., Razavyan, S., & Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F. (2021). Inverse DEA in two-stage systems based on allocative efficiency. Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems, 40(1), 591–603. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-200386

  5. [5] Ghiyasi, M., Emrouznejad, A., & Amin, G. R. (2025). Generalizing inverse data envelopment analysis through directional distance function. Expert systems with applications, 129996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129996

  6. [6] Liu, B. (2009). Some research problems in uncertainty theory. Journal of uncertain systems, 3(1), 3–10. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Baoding-Liu/publication/228666965_Some_research_problems_in_uncertainy_theory/links/02e7e52836f150c344000000/Some-research-problems-in-uncertainy-theory.pdf

  7. [7] Liu, B. (2007). Uncertainty theory. In Uncertainty theory: a branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty (pp. 1–79). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13959-8_1

  8. [8] Liu, B. (2004). Uncertainty theory: an introduction to its axiomatic foundation. Physica-verlag, heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39987-2

  9. [9] Liu, B., & Liu, Y.-K. (2002). Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE transactions on fuzzy systems, 10(4), 445–450. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Baoding-Liu/publication/3336076_Liu_Y_Expected_Value_of_Fuzzy_Variable_and_Fuzzy_Expected_Value_Models_IEEE_Transactions_on_Fuzzy_Systems_10_445-450/links/00b7d520f2c082aca8000000/Liu-Y-Expected-Value-of-Fuzzy-Variable-and-Fuzzy-Expected-Value-Models-IEEE-Transactions-on-Fuzzy-Systems-10-445-450.pdf?_sg%5B0%5D=started_experiment_milestone&origin=journalDetail

  10. [10] Gholami Golsefid, F., Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M., & Kordrostami, S. (2024). Inverse network DEA incorporating cost and revenue efficiencies under fuzzy uncertainty. Journal of mathematics, 2024(1), 8719643. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8719643

  11. [11] Huang, L., & Chen, L. (2025). Fuzzy random multi-objective optimization using a novel mixed fuzzy random inverse DEA model in input-output production. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 470, 116717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2025.116717

  12. [12] Wen, M., Guo, L., Kang, R., & Yang, Y. (2014). Data envelopment analysis with uncertain inputs and outputs. Journal of applied mathematics, 2014(1), 307108. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/307108

  13. [13] Yang, S., & Yang, X. (2025). A new uncertain two-stage network DEA model based on chance-constrained programming. Journal of industrial and management optimization, 21(3), 2032–2051. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2024161

  14. [14] Ghiyasi, M., Nasrabadi, N., & Emrouznejad, A. (2025). Inverse DEA based on cost and revenue efficiency in the absence of price information. Expert systems with applications, 284, 128028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128028

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Razavyan, S. . (2025). A Framework for Efficiency Analysis and Resource Allocation Using Inverse DEA under Uncertainty. Annals of Optimization With Applications, 1(4), 301-308. https://doi.org/10.48314/anowa.v1i4.63

Similar Articles

11-20 of 22

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.